Posted July 6, 2006
A Possible Sainthood in the Making That Shows Truth Always Wins Out
[One must wonder if the reference to a need for better clergy education then
still holds true for today. Could this possible beatification also reflect
Pope John Paul II's and Ratzinger's love of truth and their often "cutting
Taken from the National Catholic Reporter
from John Allen
Several years ago, I was on a panel in Montreal with Jesuit Fr. Bill Cain,
head writer of ABC-TV's short-lived series "Nothing Sacred." Cain described
the negative reaction the show had received in some Catholic circles, but
expressed confidence that someday its value would be recognized.
"Today they silence you, and in 200 years they beatify you," Cain joked.
"That seems to be the way it goes in the church."
"Cain's Law" is hardly universal, but it is spot-on for the early 19th
century Italian philosopher and theologian Fr. Antonio Rosmini, whose works
were censured during and after his life, but who today stands on the brink
On Monday, 155 years after Rosmini's death, Benedict XVI signed a "decree of
heroic virtue," clearing the first hurdle towards Rosmini's beatification.
In fact, Benedict approved 19 decrees on Monday, moving forward the causes
of 162 candidates.
In his famous 1848 work The Five Wounds of the Church, Rosmini identified
the most grave challenges facing the church of his day as he saw them:
The division of the people from the clergy in worship (due to ignorance and the use of Latin),
The defective education of the clergy,
The disunion of bishops (due to territorialism, nationalism and wealth),
The nomination of bishops by the secular power (rather than by election), and,
The enslavement of the church by riches (due to the long shadow of feudalism).
These positions may seem unremarkable today, but at the time they generated
enormous controversy, and left Rosmini under a cloud. In 1887, 22 years
after Rosmini's death, the Holy Office issued a decree Post obitum in which
40 "propositions" lifted from Rosmini's work were condemned. For example,
Rosmini was accused of favoring "ontologism," a sort of philosophical form
of pantheism. While the "propositions" largely had to do with the mystery of
God and creation, the politics of the 19th century hovered in the
background, especially Rosmini's openness to Italian unification over
against defenders of the temporal power of the papacy.
For more than a century, Rosmini's supporters, including the Institute of
Charity which he founded, pushed for a reevaluation.
In 1984, John Paul II approved the opening of a beatification cause for
Rosmini, and in his 1998 encyclical Fides et Ratio, John Paul referred to
Rosmini as an example of the "fruitful relationship between philosophy and
the word of God in the courageous research pursued by more recent thinkers."
(Also included on that list was John Henry Newman, another churchman who
stood under a cloud for a period of time.)
All this led to a nota of the Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith dated
July 1, 2001, which declared that the motives that led to the 1887
condemnation "can now be considered superseded," concluding that the
aberrant material in the 40 propositions "does not belong to the authentic
position of Rosmini." In effect, the nota amounted to an official
With Monday's action by Benedict XVI, Rosmini is now an authenticated
miracle away from beatification, and two from officially being declared a
One lesson the Rosmini saga may suggest is caution about hurling accusations
against today's disputed writers and activists, of whatever stripe. While
"Cain's Law" doesn't apply in every case, nevertheless history indicates
that often time has to pass before the church can reach final judgment.