home page links quotes statistics mission statement success stories resources Lighter Side Authors! Search Page
Posted March 3, 2006

Capitalism in the Dock

An Interesting analysis of the market and free-market policies
New York February 18, 2006
A zenit.org report

In this article. Bogle refers to a need for virtue and especially the virtue of truthfulness and being able to trust in each other. In other words, he is referring to the “soul” of capitalism and the need for having values that keep it wholesome. At the end of this article you will find some quotes on truth that both laud it and also reveal how difficult it can be in achieving.

After the collapse of communism and the adoption of free-market policies by just about all countries and political parties, market capitalism should be triumphant. But recent books highlight the shortcomings of the free markets.

In "The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism" (Yale University Press), John Bogle analyzes what he considers to be crucial failings in the financial markets. Bogle, former chief executive of the Vanguard mutual fund group, wants the system to be run in the interests of the shareholders and owners, rather than the managers.

Bogle argues that the last couple of decades have seen serious erosion in the conduct and values of business leaders, investment bankers and money managers. A staunch defender of capitalism and free markets, Bogle nevertheless laments the excessive attention given to stock market prices, instead of the intrinsic values of corporations.

Drawing on his own experience in the mutual fund sector, he looks at how this sector has contributed to current problems. These funds not only siphon off very large sums of money in the form of fees and their share of profits on stock market gains. They also serve to isolate managers from any form of control by stockholders, Bogle contends. Institutional investors in general, such as retirement funds and mutual funds, now own two-thirds of all U.S. equities. In fact, the largest 100 funds account for no less than 52% of equities.

Another factor adversely affecting financial markets, Bogle notes, is the concentration on short-term gains. A few decades ago mutual funds saw around 15% of their stocks turn over in a year. By the late 1990s this had risen to 100%, or more, as fund managers chased quick returns in the booming market. This trend from investment to short-term speculation in stocks means that funds are less likely to be interested in pressuring companies to improve their ethics or management.

As well, corporate directors, auditors, and legislators have all too often failed to ensure sufficient oversight of how companies are being run, leading to the scandals of recent years.

Values needed

"Capitalism requires a structure and value system that people believe in and can depend on," Bogle argues. This includes trust in the word of others, and an assurance that the system will function with equity. And for a long time this worked; capitalism delivered remarkable economic benefits.

By the late 20th century the system changed and turned into a form of "manager's capitalism." In extreme cases, it saw companies being run to benefit the managers, not the owners or shareholders. Proof of that is the soaring level of remuneration given to company executives in recent years, a trend Bogle strongly criticizes.

Shareholders have benefited too, Bogle acknowledges. Even counting the "bubble burst" in 2000, the U.S. stock market rose an average annual rate of 13% from 1982 to early 2005. (He adds, however, that a large proportion of shares that were sold before the bubble burst were those held by corporate executives.)

Bogle proposes a variety of reforms to overcome the deficiencies he outlines: performance-based compensation for executives; better corporate governance; improving accounting standards; a return to a long-term focus; and a clearer separation of ownership from management.

Another book that has drawn attention to how financial markets are causing serious problems is "Capitalism's Achilles Heel" (John Wiley & Sons). Written by Raymond Baker, ex-businessman and current guest scholar at the Washington, D.C.-based Brookings Institution, the book draws attention to problems such as bribery, money laundering, tax evasion and income inequality.

Baker is, he stresses, in favor of capitalism. But he worries that too many people today cater to its weaknesses rather than build on its strengths. He is particularly concerned that the defects he outlines are contributing to the enormous gap between rich and poor, which, in turn, is undermining the future prospects for prosperity.

Ethical market

The market also has many positive aspects. One of its defenders is John Meadowcroft, deputy director of the London-based Institute of Economic Affairs and author of the book "The Ethics of the Market" (Palgrave).

He argues that the market is an important school for virtue, and that participation in a market economy strengthens rather than weakens institutions such as the family. The market does not impose a specific set of values. The market mechanisms as such, Meadowcroft observes, can be used just as easily by selfless altruists as by selfish hedonists.

The market system does allow individuals to make choices that are morally questionable, he notes. Yet he argues that it would be a mistake to try to force morality on people. There is good reason to believe, Meadowcroft argues, that where the role of the state has expanded it has crowded out the institutions of civil society and diminished their possibility to contribute to the moral capital of society.

The ethical justification for the market lies in its being the most efficacious mechanism for helping people of whom we have no direct personal knowledge. As well, it gives individuals the greatest possible scope for determining their own destiny.

In the marketplace, people pursue their own ends and the market is able to regulate economic activity and ensure the greatest efficiency through a freely operating price system. This is not just an individualistic system, Meadowcroft argues. The market is, rather, a social process in which individuals learn that their own ends can be achieved only if they are reconciled in some way with those of other people.

By requiring people to continually review their ends in the light of information about others, communicated through price signals, the market coordinates a myriad of competing ends and values into coordinated economic activity.

In this sense, it is not correct to think of the market operating, as Adam Smith described it, through self-love. It is not selfishness that drives the market. Rather, individuals are motivated to respond to the price signals generated. Economic coordination depends on people being alert to these signals, whether the ends they seek are selfish or altruistic.

And what about the accusation that the market system leads to an unequal distribution of wealth? Meadowcroft replies that this is simply the result of the value of economic contributions as determined by the perceptions of consumers and producers. Inequality is a part of how the market works. Moreover, it is part of a system that brings with it benefits for all members of society. He does, however, contend that the state should guarantee a minimum income to ensure that no one be left in absolute poverty.

Wider view

The Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church has an ample section dedicated to the economy. It recognizes (in No. 347, for example) the positive role played by markets, which allow economic potential to be developed efficiently.

Yet, the Compendium urges that people also need to remember aspects such as ensuring justice and solidarity. They must avoid the error of seeing the accumulation of material goods as the only end of their activity.

Moreover, economic activity is only one facet of human activity and it needs to be placed within the wider context of the person. Keeping things within this wider perspective is, in fact, a key point raised by the Compendium. That's a hard sell for some, but one that would go a long way to fixing deficiencies in the way the market works.

Quotes on truth to be pondered in light of ethics in the marketplace:

One must always tell what one sees. Above all, which is more difficult, one must always see what one sees.
Charles Pierre Péguy

A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)

The true lover of knowledge naturally strives for truth, and is not content with common opinion, but soars with undimmed and unwearied passion till he grasps the essential nature of things.
Plato (428? BC - 347? BC)

One falsehood spoils a thousand truths.

Truth fears no trial.

Before you tell the "truth" to the patient, be sure you know the "truth," and that the patient wants to hear it.
Richard Clarke Cabot (1868 - 1939)

Errors, like Straws, upon the surface flow; He who would search for Pearls must dive below.
John Dryden (1631 - 1700)

God forbid that Truth should be confined to Mathematical Demonstration!
William Blake (1757 - 1827)

He said true things, but called them by wrong names.
Robert Browning (1812 - 1889)

I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it is hell.
Harry S. Truman (1884 - 1972)

I tore myself away from the safe comfort of certainties through my love for truth; and truth rewarded me.
Simone de Beauvoir (1908 - 1986)

If the truth were self-evident, eloquence would be unnecessary.
Cicero (106 - 43 BC)

It is man that makes truth great, not truth that makes man great.
Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)

It is one thing to show a man that he is in an error, and another to put him in possession of truth.
John Locke (1632 - 1704)